Discussion:
If "FRACKING" is giving the earth an enema, what results would you expect?
(too old to reply)
William Gigantus
2014-06-24 18:10:06 UTC
Permalink
It depends on what's in the enema.

My mother used soapy water and I would blast off like a rocket ship.

There would be *some* natural gas, but everything else was crap.

Hormone-disrupting activity of fracking chemicals worse than initially
found
http://www.naturalblaze.com/2014/06/hormone-disrupting-activity-of-fracking.html

- See more at:
http://www.naturalblaze.com/2014/06/hormone-disrupting-activity-of-fracking.html#sthash.NCbB89B4.dpuf

Many chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, can disrupt
not only the human body's reproductive hormones but also the
glucocorticoid and thyroid hormone receptors, which are necessary to
maintain good health, a new study finds. The results were presented
Monday at the joint meeting of the International Society of
Endocrinology and the Endocrine Society: ICE/ENDO 2014 in Chicago.

"Among the chemicals that the fracking industry has reported using
most often, all 24 that we have tested block the activity of one or
more important hormone receptors," said the study's presenting author,
Christopher Kassotis, a PhD student at the University of Missouri,
Columbia. "The high levels of hormone disruption by
endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) that we measured, have been
associated with many poor health outcomes, such as infertility, cancer
and birth defects."

Hydraulic fracturing is the process of injecting numerous chemicals
and millions of gallons of water deep underground under high pressure
to fracture hard rock and release trapped natural gas and oil.
Kassotis said spills of wastewater could contaminate surface and
ground water.


In earlier research, this group found that water samples collected
from sites with documented fracking spills in Garfield County,
Colorado, had moderate to high levels of EDC activity that mimicked or
blocked the effects of the female hormones (estrogens) and the male
hormones (androgens) in human cells. However, water in areas away from
these gas-drilling sites showed little EDC activity on these two
reproductive hormones.

The new study extended the analysis to learn whether high-use fracking
chemicals changed other key hormone receptors besides the estrogen and
androgen receptors. (Receptors are proteins in cells that the hormone
binds to in order to perform its function.) Specifically, the
researchers also looked at the receptor for a female reproductive
hormone, progesterone, as well as those for glucocorticoid—a hormone
important to the immune system, which also plays a role in
reproduction and fertility—and for thyroid hormone. The latter hormone
helps control metabolism, normal brain development and other functions
needed for good health.

Among 24 common fracking chemicals that Kassotis and his colleagues
repeatedly tested for EDC activity in human cells, 20 blocked the
estrogen receptor, preventing estrogen from binding to the receptor
and being able to have its natural biological response, he reported.
In addition, 17 chemicals inhibited the androgen receptor, 10 hindered
the progesterone receptor, 10 blocked the glucocorticoid receptor and
7 inhibited the thyroid hormone receptor.

Kassotis cautioned that they have not measured these chemicals in
local water samples, and it is likely that the high chemical
concentrations tested would not show up in drinking water near
drilling. However, he said mixtures of these chemicals act together to
make their hormone-disrupting effects worse than any one chemical
alone, and tested drinking water normally contains mixtures of EDCs.

"We don't know what the adverse health consequences might be in humans
and animals exposed to these chemicals," Kassotis said, "but infants
and children would be most vulnerable because they are smaller, and
infants lack the ability to break down these chemicals."

This study received funding from the Passport Foundation Science
Innovation Fund, the University of Missouri, and from the
Environmental Protection Agency, through a STAR predoctoral fellowship
awarded to Kassotis.

Founded in 1916, the Endocrine Society is the world's oldest, largest
and most active organization devoted to research on hormones and the
clinical practice of endocrinology. Today, the Endocrine Society's
membership consists of over 17,000 scientists, physicians, educators,
nurses and students in more than 100 countries. Society members
represent all basic, applied and clinical interests in endocrinology.
The Endocrine Society is based in Washington, DC. To learn more about
the Society and the field of endocrinology, visit our site at
http://www.endocrine.org. Follow us on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/#!/EndoMedia. - See more at:
http://www.naturalblaze.com/2014/06/hormone-disrupting-activity-of-fracking.html#sthash.NCbB89B4.dpuf
William Gigantus
2014-06-24 23:04:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by William Gigantus
It depends on what's in the enema.
My mother used soapy water and I would blast off like a rocket ship.
There would be *some* natural gas, but everything else was crap.
Projecting again. Now that mummy is no longer around he needs someone to
give him the "soapy water". They don't come more pathetic than this freak.
David
Star of David, (Hymie)

Are you in the Fracking Industry?

A member of the Log Cabin Republicans?

Or just a shill for the American Oil Nazis? (Congress)

National Cash For Natural Gas - Fracking Industry Contributions to
Congress
http://www.citizensforethics.org/pages/natural-cash-fracking-industry-contributions-to-congress

The fracking boom is yielding gushers of campaign contributions for
congressional candidates from districts containing hydraulically
fractured wells. A new CREW analysis of federal campaign contribution
data tracked by MapLight found contributions from the industry to
House and Senate candidates from districts and states home to fracking
activity rose by 231 percent between the 2004 and 2012 election
cycles. In contrast, industry contributions to candidates from
nonfracking districts rose by 131 percent, over the same time period.

Chart - Fracking Industry contributions to senate candidates“Like many
industries under increasing scrutiny, the fracking industry has
responded by ratcheting up campaign donations to help make new friends
in Congress,” said CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan. “As CREW’s
report shows, the fracking boom isn’t just good for the industry, but
also for congressional candidates in fracking districts.”

The steady increases in federal campaign contributions from the
fracking industry correlate with the intensifying debate over whether
the federal government should have more oversight of the industry. For
example, the biggest increase in industry contributions — nearly 41
percent between the 2010 and 2012 election cycles — came at a time
when Congress was actively debating fracking.

The top 10 recipients of fracking industry contributions are a mix of
strong industry supporters and Republican leadership. Rep. Joe Barton
(R-TX), chairman emeritus of the House Committee on Energy and
Commerce, received the most contributions, raking in $509,447 between
the 2004 and 2012 election cycles — over $100,000 more than the next
closest recipient, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), who
received $384,700. While serving as chairman of the committee, Rep.
Barton sponsored the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which exempted
fracking from the Safe Drinking Water Act. Overall, nearly 80 percent
of fracking industry contributions went to Republican congressional
candidates.

Loading...